Knowledge From the Afrikan World, For the World

PMC Articles

“I want to lift my people up”: Exploring the psychological correlates of racial themes within the life stories of midlife Black Americans

PMCID: PMC11891957

PMID: 38606602

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study explores how middle‐aged Black Americans talk about race, without prompting, while telling their life stories. Method Drawing upon a dataset of lengthy Life Story Interviews ( N = 70), we first employed a keyword search to identify race‐relevant interview scenes for each participant. Next, we conducted a thematic analysis of these scenes to identify salient racial narrative themes. Finally, we coded race‐relevant scenes to examine the psychological correlates of racial narrative themes. Results We identified 460 total racially themed Life Story Interview scenes, with the number of racially themed scenes ranging from 1 to 17 across participants' interviews. Racial narrative themes included Community of Care , Black Cultural Identity , Multiculturalism , Activism , Encounter with Racism , Systemic Racism , and Racial Reckoning. Quantitative analyses highlight a relationship between racial narrative themes and psychological measures of wisdom and generativity. Conclusion This study offers insight into the ways that race manifests in the life stories of Black Americans and highlights the importance of considering race in the study of narrative identity, and personality, more broadly.

Full Text

Human beings make sense of their lives through stories. Personality and developmental psychologists use the term narrative identity to refer to an integrative and evolving story in the mind of a person that reconstructs the past and imagines the future (McAdams, 2001; McAdams & McLean, 2013; Singer, 2004). The story addresses questions like this: Who am I? Who am I becoming? What does my life mean? (McAdams, 2021). While this story develops internally, it is permeable to the outside world: cultural context shapes how people construct their stories, and stories in turn position individuals as active participants in society as they make sense of who they are, who they are becoming, and what their lives may mean (Hammack, 2008; McLean & Syed, 2015).
U.S. history is steeped in notions of white supremacy and anti‐Blackness, which continue to shape the present‐day American cultural context (Rogers, Niwa, et al., 2021).  Racial groups were originally devised to establish a hierarchy of humanness that reinforced these ideologies, with those categorized as “white” at the top, those categorized as “Black” at the bottom, and all other groups judged by proximity to these anchors (Rogers, Niwa, et al., 2021). While the implications of racial categorization have shifted through acts of resistance across history, racism persists, and continues to shape the daily experiences—and identities—of Americans. Amidst this historical context, psychologists have long been interested in how individuals navigate racism and develop a sense of racial identity.
Theories of racial identity development consider both process—how individuals' attitudes toward their racial group change over time—and content—what their attitudes are (Galliher et al., 2017; Scottham et al., 2010). Cross's (1971) Nigrescence theory offered an influential framework for understanding the process by which Black Americans navigate their racial identities. Initially unaware of race (Preencounter), Cross (1971) suggested, Black individuals are faced with an experience (Encounter) that prompts them to grapple with their new racial consciousness (Immersion‐Emersion), which allows their racial identity to take hold and deepen (Internalization), ultimately contributing to a sense of collective identity and motivating activism (Internalization Commitment) (Neville & Cross, 2017). The theory cautioned that not all individuals go through every stage of this process, and individuals may also cycle through different stages at different times in their lives.
On the content side, Sellers et al.'s (1998) Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity (MMRI) sets forth four dimensions of racial identity—racial salience, racial centrality, racial regard, and racial ideology—on which individuals naturally differ. The dominant approach to research on racial identity has been to translate these dimensions into quantitative measures and to examine relationships between these measures of racial identity and psychological outcomes. For example, the racial centrality dimension of the MMRI, which measures how important race is to a person's self‐concept (Sellers et al., 1998), has shown correlations with achievement motivation among African American girls (Butler‐Barnes et al., 2018), civic engagement and activism among Black young adults (Chapman‐Hilliard et al., 2022; Christophe et al., 2022; Pender et al., 2019), and healthcare mistrust among African American adults (Cuevas & O'Brien, 2019). Furthermore, while people higher in racial centrality tend to report more experiences of discrimination (Burrow & Ong, 2010; Chae et al., 2017; Sellers & Shelton, 2003), racial centrality also serves as a protective factor against the negative impact of these experiences (Seaton & Zeiders, 2021; Sellers et al., 2003).
Whereas these studies shed light on the psychological significance of racial identity, a growing body of qualitative studies have probed into people's lived experiences as members of their racial group. These studies are broad‐ranging and include topics such as how children's racial identity narratives changed with the surge of the Black Lives Matter movement (Rogers, Rosario, et al., 2021), how African international students make sense of their Black racial identity in the United States (Asante et al., 2016), and how African American elders reminisce about their life experiences as African Americans (Shellman, 2004). A common approach across most qualitative studies of racial identity is to directly prompt individuals to talk about their racial experiences. The current study takes a different approach, exploring race from the vantage point of a person's broader narrative identity. While a focus on narrative identity does not preclude direct prompting about a person's racial experience—and indeed, racial identity could be conceived as part of a person's narrative identity—studies of narrative identity have not historically included prompts about race. Drawing on data from one of the most extensive studies of narrative identity to date, we consider how even without prompting, a sample of Black Americans talk about race while telling their life stories.
Considering race from the vantage point of narrative identity, we draw on Erik Erikson's (1963) conception of identity as an arrangement of the self, typically achieved in young adulthood but evolving thereafter, that situates the person in the adult world while providing a person's life with a sense of “inner sameness and continuity” (p. 261). Erikson (1963) characterized the awareness of identity as a process of reckoning with discontinuity, both within oneself and with respect to one's positioning in the broader social world.
Building on Erikson's conception, McAdams (1985) suggested that the problem of identity first arises when adolescents and young adults sense discontinuity and inconsistency in their lives, across roles and over time, and seek to resolve the problem through narrative. The discontinuity may arise in many different forms. For example, a young person may believe that “when I am with my friends, I am outgoing and speak my mind, but when I am in class, I am quiet and don't say a word”; or, “when I was younger, I thought all white people were bad but now I host people from all over the world regularly at my home.” In order to make sense of such varied and conflicting experiences, individuals construct stories to explain how they have changed over time and what the different roles in their lives may mean. These stories comprise a person's narrative identity (McAdams & McLean, 2013; McLean et al., 2007), which develops as an internal, continually evolving narrative that integrates a person's experiences together into a coherent sense of self. In this way, narrative identity serves as a psychological resource, providing individuals with a sense of unity and purpose in their lives (McAdams, 2021). McAdams (1995) further conceived of narrative identity as one of three layers of personality, with the first layer consisting of a person's dispositional traits, the second layer consisting of a person's characteristic motivational agenda, and the third layer consisting of a person's identity and evolving life story. By exploring the racial content of life stories, we thus highlight the relevance of race to the study of personality among Black Americans, at the level of narrative identity.
Whereas identity is in one sense deeply personal, it is also profoundly cultural. Erikson (1968) described identity as a process that takes place, “in the core of an individual and yet also in the core of his communal culture, a process which establishes, in fact, the identity of those two identities” (p. 22, as cited in Rogers, 2018). Likewise, McAdams (2021) describes narrative identity as a psychosocial construction, co‐authored by individuals and their surrounding cultures.
Methodological approaches for examining how narrative identity interacts with culture typically rely on the analysis of life stories. Methods include comparing narrative themes across cultural groups (e.g., Boytos et al., 2020; Reese et al., 2014, 2017; Turner, 2022; Wang & Singer, 2021), examining how personal narratives align with and deviate from broader cultural scripts or master narratives (e.g., Hammack, 2010; McLean et al., 2018; Westberg, 2022 ), exploring life narratives of a nondominant cultural group (e.g., Bigabo & Jansen, 2020; Ramirez & Hammack, 2014), and eliciting narratives about cultural events or experiences (e.g., Weststrate & McLean, 2010).
Although these studies differ in their specific approaches, one common methodological feature is that they involve collecting narrative accounts of specific experiences, events or memories, and evaluating a standard set of narratives for each participant (Adler et al., 2017). For example, Weststrate and McLean (2010) asked 251 participants to describe (1) a cultural event and (2) a self‐defining memory that shaped their gay or lesbian identity, and their subsequent analysis considered features of participants' responses to these two prompts. Likewise, Reese et al. (2014) conducted interviews with 268 adolescents, coding three interview scenes—(1) high point, (2) low point, and (3) turning point narratives—for narrative themes and comparing themes across cultural groups.
Well‐being, which refers to a person's overall sense of meaning and purpose in life, is considered an important outcome measure across psychological disciplines. The narrative identity literature reveals a clear link between narrative features and psychological well‐being. Adler et al. (2016) delineated this link across four dimensions of narrative identity—motivational themes such as agency and communion, affective themes such as positive and negative emotional tone, meaning‐making themes such as growth and exploration, and structural elements such as narrative coherence—noting where narrative variables add incremental validity as predictors of well‐being compared to other variables across a number of studies (e.g., Adler, 2012; King et al., 2000; McAdams et al., 2001; Reese et al., 2011). Likewise, a substantial body of research has explored links between dimensions of racial and ethnic identity and positive mental health outcomes (e.g., Chew, 2015; Neblett et al., 2012; Rivas‐Drake et al., 2014; Smith & Silva, 2011; Yip et al., 2019). For example, in a meta‐analysis of studies utilizing the Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (RIAS) and various measures of psychological well‐being, Chew (2015) reported a positive correlation between the Internalization subscale of the RIAS, which measures the extent to which race is positively incorporated into a person's self‐concept, and psychological well‐being. Bridging this literature, the current study explores how the presence of racial themes within narrative identity may correlate with psychological well‐being.
Importantly, much of the existing research on racial and ethnic identity and positive mental health outcomes focuses on younger samples (Chew, 2015; Smith & Silva, 2011). Given the age group of our sample, we explore two additional developmentally appropriate psychological outcomes: generativity and wisdom. Within Erikson's (1963) theory of psychosocial development, generativity represents the central challenge of middle adulthood, as the core question guiding a person's development shifts from, “Who am I?” to “What will I leave behind?” (McAdams, 2018). Generativity reflects a person's commitment to caring for future generations through activities such as parenting, teaching, mentoring, leadership, and service to the community (McAdams, 2018). McAdams and de St Aubin (1992) lay out how generativity ultimately finds expression through narrative identity: a combination of cultural influences and inner desire prompt a person to develop a sense of concern for future generations, which ideally leads to a deeper commitment to developing generative goals, which in turn promotes generative action. Examples of generative action include giving birth to children, coming up with creative ideas, preserving rituals and traditions, participating in social movements, and letting go of one's generative efforts in the hope that what was created and nurtured will continue to flourish (McAdams, 2018). Throughout this process, individuals make narrative sense of their experiences, telling stories about their generative concerns and actions that are ultimately incorporated into their broader life stories.
Likewise, later adulthood is characterized by the challenge of accepting one's life experiences as, “something that had to be” (Erikson, 1963, p. 268), a process that nurtures a growing sense of wisdom (Erikson, 1982). While there is debate among psychologists about what, exactly, constitutes wisdom, a recent meta‐analysis identified two general approaches to conceptualizing wisdom: performative wisdom, which captures how individuals respond in specific scenarios, and phenomenological wisdom, which captures people's recollections of their daily internal experiences (Dong et al., 2023). Dong et al. (2023) suggest that differences among measures have resulted in ambiguities in the nomological net of wisdom. For example, although meta‐analytic results suggest a statistically significant correlation between wisdom and age, this correlation is moderated by wisdom type and wisdom measure, with most wisdom measures showing no significant relationship with age (Dong et al., 2023). That said, psychologists generally agree that wisdom reflects a sense of psychological maturity, gained through life experience, that allows certain older people to guide and counsel younger generations (McAdams et al., 2022; Taylor et al., 2011). Previous research has suggested that the ability to guide and counsel younger generations may be especially important among Black Americans: Black Americans tend to score higher on measures of generativity than white Americans (e.g., Hart et al., 2001; Newton & Baltys, 2014) and are also more likely to see themselves as sources of wisdom for their children (McAdams, 2013). The current study builds upon these findings to consider how the tendency to incorporate race into one's life story may relate to generativity and wisdom.
The central aim of the current study is to explore how race manifests in the life stories of Black Americans. To do this, we employ a sequential mixed methods design
with three phases: first, we identify race‐relevant scenes and explore the prevalence of these scenes within a larger set of life story interviews. Second, we inductively derive a set of “racial narrative themes” from these scenes. Third, we code each scene for the presence or absence of these themes to examine correlations between racial narrative themes and three psychological outcomes: psychological well‐being, wisdom, and generativity. It is worth highlighting that most existing research on identity is conducted with white, young adult, and emerging adult college students (Mitchell et al., 2021), and our focus on middle‐aged Black Americans expands this literature. Moreover, our multi‐method approach considers not only the racial content of narrative identity but also how this content corresponds with psychological outcomes. Our inductive qualitative analysis is thus strengthened by an exploratory, data‐driven approach, and the qualitative and quantitative nature of this study allows for a broad exploration of how race permeates the narrative identities and psychological health of middle‐aged Black Americans.
Participants for this study were drawn from the larger Foley Longitudinal Study of Adulthood (FLSA; e.g., McAdams & Guo, 2015), conducted at Northwestern University between 2008 and 2018. The original study was approved by the Northwestern University Office for Research Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the protocol ID STU00001801. Participants were recruited via public venues such as the internet, bulletin boards, and newspaper ads, in the city of Chicago and surrounding suburbs. The original sample included 163 Black (N = 73) and white (N = 90) late‐midlife adults. From this sample, 3 Black participants did not complete a Life Story Interview during Year 1 of FLSA and were thus excluded from the current study. In this study, 70 participants were included on the basis that they (1) completed a Year 1 Life Story Interview and (2) selected their race/ethnicity as “African American,” (N = 67), “Interracial” (N = 1), or “Other” (N = 2).
Participants ranged in age from 52 to 56 years (M = 54.44, SD = 1.11) and were 73% female and 27% male. Annual family income levels of participants at the onset of the study ranged from under $25,000 to over $300,000, with a median income range of $50,000–$75,000. Education levels ranged from “high school” to “graduate work,” with a median education level of “college.”
Participants completed the Year 1 Life Story Interview (LSI; McAdams, 2008) in a dedicated interview room at Northwestern University. Of the nine trained interviewers—graduate students, postdocs, and faculty members—eight were white and one was Black and biracial (Reischer et al., 2021). In addition to the interview, participants also completed a battery of self‐report measures. Participants were compensated $75 for each survey battery and $75 for each interview completed. Interviews were audio‐recorded and professionally transcribed. Participants completed this process during Year 1, Year 5, and Year 9 of the study, with abridged versions of this protocol conducted in the years between. For the current study, we focus on data from Year 1 of FLSA.
The LSI (McAdams, 2008) is a comprehensive set of 22 prompts or “scenes” designed to capture narrative identity. The Year 1 interview included seven sections, each containing 1–8 scenes: (1) Life Chapters (1 scene), in which participants were asked think of their lives as a book or novel and summarize each chapter; (2) Key Scenes (8 scenes), in which participants were asked to describe a high point, low point, turning point, positive childhood memory, negative childhood memory, vivid adult memory, religious, spiritual or mystical experience, and wisdom event in their lives; (3) Future Script (3 scenes), in which participants were asked to describe the next chapter in their lives, their dreams, hopes and plans, and a life project they are currently working on; (4) Challenges (4 scenes), in which participants were asked to describe their greatest life challenge, a health challenge, a loss, and a failure or regret; (5) Personal Ideology (4 scenes), in which participants were asked about their religious, ethical, political, social and other values; (6) Life Theme (1 scene), in which participants were asked to look back over their life and discern a central theme, message or idea; and (7) Reflection (1 scene), in which participants were asked to share any reflections on the experience of the interview (McAdams, 2008). Importantly, the interview did not include questions about race. The full interview protocol is available here: https://osf.io/tr7zv/.
Although noted above, we wish to highlight several elements of the original study design which set parameters for the current investigation of racial narratives within FLSA. First, all but one interviewer was white. While narrative identity represents an internal story, sharing this story in the context of an interview is ultimately an interpersonal process. Listeners influence the stories people choose to relate to as well as the way people tell these stories (Pasupathi & Billitteri, 2015). For example, Rogers, Versey and Cielto (2021) offer a powerful example of how interviewers' shared positionality with their participants as Black women interviewing Black girls allowed participants to assume a “relational ‘we‐ness’” (p. 7) with their interviewers, shaping the way they shared their stories. In the case of the current investigation, it is important to recognize that subsequent findings largely reflect how participants talk about race while telling their life stories to a white person.
Second, none of the LSI questions directly asks participants to talk about race. While the Life Story Interview was designed to elicit a person's broader narrative identity, this does not preclude incorporating questions related to race. Racial identity scholars have highlighted how the content and wording of questions influence the extent to which participants engage with cultural constructs throughout an interview (Rogers et al., 2022). Thus, it is important to recognize that subsequent findings reflect how participants talk about race without prompting and that a different set of prompts might elicit a different conceptualization of the role of race within narrative identity.
In addition to the historical context shaping participants' lives, the current analysis, conducted between 2021 and 2023, was motivated and shaped by the historical context of researchers' lives: our analysis comes at a time of increased attention to racial justice following highly publicized violence against Black lives, the resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement, and the widespread reckoning with the persistence of racism across time (Neville & Cross, 2017). Researchers' individual experiences also shaped their interpretations of participants' stories. Experiences shaping the first author's perspective included being a Southeast Asian (Indian) American woman in her late twenties, having parents who are immigrants, and working at a nonprofit where she organized community dialogues centered around race. Experiences shaping the second author's perspective included being a first‐generation, young Black woman in her early twenties, raised by Dominican family members in the Bronx. As a Psychology and Black Studies student, the second author drew upon both disciplines, along with her own national and diasporic identity to listen for the breadth of Blackness within participants' stories. The third author's perspective was shaped by her experience being a Southeast Asian (Thai) woman in her early 20s and by her earliest exposure to American culture—living temporarily in a predominantly Black and Mexican community in the United States as a child—as well as by conversations about race after returning to America as an adult. Experiences shaping the fourth author's perspective include being a white man in his late 60s who grew up in a segregated midwestern city, where race relations were fraught, as well as engaging in previous research and writing about narrative identity among Black Americans in midlife (e.g., McAdams, 2013).
From the full Life Story Interviews, we sought to identify the unique subset of scenes, for each participant, containing race‐related themes. Our focus on scenes aligns with existing guidelines for analyzing narrative data (e.g., Adler et al., 2017); however, our procedure for data preparation departs from previous studies of narrative identity in that we selected scenes for analysis based on the presence of specific thematic content. In particular, we conducted a keyword search for race‐related terms, with keywords derived from the data, and included only those scenes containing race‐related terms. “Race‐related terms” were defined as any words that the first three authors identified as connected to race in some way, whether explicitly or implicitly. Implicit references were included with the understanding that race permeates many aspects of a person's experience, and racism intersects with other systems of oppression such as classism and sexism (Cole, 2009; Crenshaw, 1991). The first author began by reading 10 full interviews, randomly selected from the data set, and keeping a list of any race‐relevant terms she could identify within these interviews. The second and third authors repeated this process with five additional interviews each.
Authors' keyword lists were merged, alphabetized, and edited to remove duplicates. Using the NVivo Text Search tool, each word was then assessed by examining the contexts in which it appeared in the dataset. Primary reasons for exclusion were that the word was too broad, turning up many instances that did not clearly relate to race (e.g., “attractive,” “background,” “bible”), or that the word occurred infrequently, without a clear connection to race. Examples of keywords in the final list are presented in Table 1 (organized by general category). The full list of keywords can be found here: https://osf.io/tr7zv/.
Our full list of keywords was entered into the NVivo Text Search tool, which highlighted all instances of these words (including stems) within each interview. In every transcript, LSI scenes were demarcated by interview prompts, marking a shift from one scene to the next. Each interview was trimmed to include only the scenes, unique to each participant, containing one or more racial keywords.
In this process, one scene, Life Chapters, was split into smaller sections due to the lengthy responses it elicited, and each section was considered a separate scene. These trimmed “racial narratives” were used for subsequent analysis.
Racial narratives were organized in order of keyword frequency. Following the steps for thematic analysis outlined by McAdams (2012), the authors started with the interview containing the highest frequency of race‐related keywords, highlighting noteworthy excerpts, and annotating the interview with inferences. The authors met to discuss their impressions, reflecting on how their own experiences shaped what stood out to them in the interview. The authors repeated this process for each subsequent interview, meeting regularly to discuss their impressions, and continuing this process until they started to see recurring themes. These recurring themes were organized into an initial list of categories. To explore how these categories emerged across the broader sample, the authors then assessed a subset of interviews for the presence or absence of each category, refining the categories in this process to develop a final list of themes.
Following Syed and Nelson's (2015) guidance on quantifying qualitative data, a working coding manual was developed to include a description of each theme, inclusion and exclusion rules, examples of excerpts that would be coded as each theme, and negative cases. The full set of 460 racial narratives was then coded for the presence or absence of these themes (presence = 1; absence = 0). The unit of analysis was defined as each scene, meaning that raters assigned separate codes to each scene within each participant's racial narrative. The themes were divided into two subsets, and a team of two raters coded the narratives for each subset of themes. Raters coded the narratives in eight batches, and interrater reliability was assessed for each batch. Raters met regularly to discuss disagreements, including further discussion of how their own experiences shaped their interpretation of the data. The coding manual was updated after each meeting to reflect a developing mutual perspective on the scope of each theme. The final coding manual is available here: https://osf.io/tr7zv/.
Each raters' codes were combined into a master spreadsheet. Average codes were calculated across each team, for each data point, and used for subsequent analysis. Overall, frequencies of each theme were calculated by summing codes for each theme. Scene‐level data were aggregated to create composite scores for each theme at the participant level. Since participants differed in the number of total scenes within their racial narratives, a new variable, Number of Racially Themed Scenes, was created to capture this information about the overall salience of race within each participant's life story (Figure 1).
Within their battery of self‐report measures, participants completed measures of psychological well‐being, wisdom, and generativity. Psychological well‐being was measured using Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well‐Being (PWB; Ryff & Keyes, 1995), which considers well‐being across six dimensions: autonomy (“my decisions are not usually influenced by what everyone else is doing”), environmental mastery (“I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily life”), personal growth (“I think it is important to have new experiences that challenge how you think about yourself and the world”), positive relationships (“people would describe me as a giving person, willing to share my time with others”), purpose in life (“some people wander aimlessly through life, but I am not one of them”), and self‐acceptance (“I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily life”). Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with items on a 1–6 scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” Cronbach's alpha for the current sample was 0.92 across all items.
Wisdom was measured through the Self‐Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS; Webster, 2003), which considers wisdom as a combination of five dimensions: experience (“I have seen much of the negative side of life”), emotion regulation (“I can regulate my emotions when the situation calls for it”), reminiscence and reflectiveness (“I often recall earlier times in my life to see how I've changed since then”), openness (“I'm very curious about other religions and/or philosophical belief systems”), and humor (“I can make fun of myself to comfort others”). Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with items on a 1–6 scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” Cronbach's alpha for the current sample was 0.82 across all items.
Generativity, broadly defined as concern for future generations, was measured through the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS; McAdams & de St Aubin, 1992), which includes items such as, “I try to pass along the knowledge I have gained through my experiences,” “I have a responsibility to improve the neighborhood in which I live,” and “I have created things that have made an impact on other people.” Participants rated how often the statement applied to them, on a 0–3 scale ranging from “never” to “very often or nearly always.” Cronbach's alpha for the current sample was 0.80 across all items. Descriptive statistics for all self‐report measures are reported in Table 3.
Through a broad keyword search for race‐related terms, we identified 460 racially themed interview scenes. All participants referenced race at least once during their Life Story Interview, and the number of scenes in which participants referenced race ranged from 1 to 17 (Figure 1) with an average of 6.57 racially themed scenes. Participants in the lowest range of racially themed scenes tended to reference race indirectly and sparsely, through words such as “wig,” “community,” and “Baptist.” Participants in the higher ranges tended to reference race directly and frequently within each scene, using terms such as “Black,” “African American,” and “racism.”
Overall, 152 scenes (33%) fell within the Key Scenes section of the Life Story Interview. Asked to recall a vivid memory from her adult life, for example, Shirley referenced her Black identity while describing what it meant to her family when she walked across the stage to receive her law degree
:

Through an iterative process of reading racial narratives and keeping track of themes, we identified seven overarching racial narrative themes: Black Cultural Identity, Community of Care, Systemic Racism, Activism, Racial Reckoning, Multiculturalism, and Encounter with Racism. We present these themes, along with an exemplary quote, in Table 2.
Upon identifying these racial narrative themes, we “coded” each scene, in two teams, for the presence or absence of each theme. Importantly, these themes were interrelated and not mutually exclusive. Overall interrater reliability ranged from good to excellent: M
? = 0.70 and M
% agreement = 87 for team one; M
? = 0.76 and M
% agreement = 88 for team two. Interrater reliability for individual themes ranged from fair to excellent: for Black Cultural Identity, ? = 0.78 and % agreement = 89; for Community of Care, ? = 0.54 and % agreement = 77; for Systemic Racism, ? = 0.64 and % agreement = 83; for Activism, ? = 0.65 and % agreement = 87; for Racial Reckoning, ? = 0.56 and % agreement = 86; for Multiculturalism, ? = 0.70 and % agreement = 94; for Encounter with Racism, ? = 0.71 and % agreement = 96. Table 3 presents descriptive statistics, including the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range for each study variable.
Most narrative themes spanned a wide range of scores and were skewed toward the lower end of the distribution. Multiculturalism and Encounter with Racism spanned narrower ranges. These themes were less common overall: several participants did not include these themes in their racial narratives, and those who did included them relatively infrequently. These differences in the range of our narrative themes may be due to differences in nature of each theme: Black Cultural Identity, Community of Care, and Systemic Racism, in particular, were broader constructs that encompassed a wide variety of responses, while Multiculturalism and Encounter with Racism were narrower constructs and therefore captured fewer and a smaller range of responses. Complimenting these descriptive statistics, we also examined the prevalence of each theme across participants and across all scenes (Figure 2). Community of Care and Black Cultural Identity were the most frequently occurring themes, with Community of Care represented across 94% of participants and within 47% of total scenes coded and Black Cultural Identity represented across 88% of participants and within 49% of total scenes coded. In comparison, Multiculturalism was less common, represented across 57% of participants and within 11% of total scenes coded. Likewise, Encounter with Racism was the least frequently occurring theme, represented across 37% of participants and within 8% of total scenes coded.
Finally, most of our narrative variables were significantly correlated with each other (Table 4). All themes were moderately to highly correlated with overall number of racially themed scenes (r = 0.42 to r = 0.76): in other words, talking about race in a wider selection of Life Story Interview scenes corresponded to higher levels of racial narrative themes. This makes sense, given that scenes were selected for their racial content and themes were derived directly from these scenes. Furthermore, most themes were moderately correlated with each other (r = 0.20 to r = 0.51), and some themes were highly correlated with each other (r = 0.66 to r = 0.85). For example, Black Cultural Identity, Encounter with Racism, Systemic Racism and Racial Reckoning were highly intercorrelated, which makes sense, given that participants often referenced their Black/African American identity when highlighting incidents of racism, referencing broader systems of oppression, and reckoning with race. Furthermore, stories about encounters with racism were likely to contain references to broader systems at play and reflections on the experience. And when participants reckoned with race, for the most part, this meant reflecting on some aspect of racism. Likewise, Activism was also highly correlated with Black Cultural Identity, Systemic Racism, and Racial Reckoning, which highlights a noteworthy relationship between participants' tendency to incorporate race and racism into their narrative identities and their motivation to contribute to the broader world.
The final aim of this study was to examine correlations between racial narrative variables (including racial narrative themes and Number of Racially Themed Scenes) and three measures of psychological health: psychological well‐being, wisdom, and generativity. Table 4 includes these correlational results, which suggest that the salience of race within the Life Story Interview is associated with wisdom and generativity. Specifically, generativity showed significant positive correlations with the Number of Racially Themed Scenes (r = 0.37), Black Cultural Identity (r = 0.33), Multiculturalism (r = 0.37), Activism (r = 0.37), Systemic Racism (r = 0.31), and Racial Reckoning (r = 0.28). Wisdom showed significant positive correlations with Number of Racially Themed Scenes (r = 0.26), Black Cultural Identity (r = 0.24), Multiculturalism (r = 0.30), and Activism (r = 0.28). Although wisdom and generativity were both significantly correlated with well‐being, none of the racial narrative variables showed significant correlations with well‐being.
The purpose of this study was to explore the role of race within the broader narrative identity of Black Americans in midlife. While telling their life stories, 100% of participants referenced race, and the number of interview scenes in which participants referenced race ranged from 1 to 17, highlighting both the overall salience of race for participants as they narrated their life stories and the natural variance in the extent to which participants brought up race while telling their stories. We use the term salience rather than centrality, in line with Sellers et al.'s (1998) MMRI, to highlight that this interview represents a particular situational context. Participants were asked to tell their life stories without any prompting to speak specifically about race, and in most cases, participants shared their life stories with a white interviewer. It is likely that a different situation—for example, being prompted to speak about race and/or speaking with Black interviewers only—would have resulted in different levels of racial discourse throughout the Life Story Interview. However, it is not entirely surprising that race‐related content was mentioned by all participants in our sample, given the cultural context of racism in the United States and the cohort effect of growing up during the highly racially salient civil rights period.
These qualitative results fall in line with existing frameworks for understanding racism and racial identity development. For example, Systemic Racism and Encounter with Racism parallel structural and interpersonal interpretations of racism. Furthermore, Systemic Racism occurred more frequently across our data set than Encounter with Racism, exemplifying a phenomenon that racial identity researchers have previously highlighted: individuals are often hesitant to explicitly name experiences of racism, and this hesitance itself reflects a cultural norm (Rogers et al., 2022). Yet racism often operates covertly through systems rather than overtly through interpersonal interactions, and our results suggest that individuals may be more comfortable referencing covert racism while telling their life stories.
Our life story data also reflect the notion of racial socialization: that as Black children grow up, community members can help reduce the negative impacts of racism by raising awareness about structural inequality, promoting critical consciousness, and nurturing a strong sense of identity (Umami‐Taylor & Hill, 2020). For example, James's third‐grade teacher instructed her students about the inequalities they would face as Black children and equipped them with tools to face this harsh reality. In a review of the literature on parents’ ethnic‐racial socialization, Hughes et al. (2006) identified the following themes, which parallel themes in our set of racial narratives: (1) cultural socialization, which includes instilling racial pride as captured within Black Cultural Identity, (2) preparation for bias, which involves raising awareness about racial barriers and racism, as captured within Community of Care and Activism, (3) promotion of mistrust, which emphasizes the need for caution in interracial interactions, and (4) egalitarianism, which highlights equality among ethnic‐racial groups, as captured within Multiculturalism.
In some cases, our racial narratives and corresponding themes also mapped onto Cross's (1971) stages of Nigrescence. At the start of his story, for example, James describes experiences of racial violence during the Civil Rights Movement (Encounter/Encounter with Racism), which prompts him to grapple with his racial identity (Immersion‐Emersion/Racial Reckoning). His racial consciousness is deepened when his family moves to Michigan and he attends an integrated school for the first time, where he observes differences in opportunities afforded to Black and white students (Internalization/Systemic Racism). Over time, James's racial consciousness motivates his goals to improve the educational system for all kids and to, “raise every Black man and [boy's] level of consciousness so they could understand…what they are facing in this society” (Internalization Commitment/Black Cultural Identity/Activism).
Likewise, our racial narrative themes also reflect elements of the MMRI (Sellers et al., 1998). For example, the MMRI includes the dimension of Racial Ideology, a person's philosophies about how members of their racial group should relate to society. These philosophies include nationalist and humanist perspectives. The nationalist perspective highlights the unique history, culture, and accomplishments of African Americans, as captured within Black Cultural Identity, while the humanist philosophy emphasizes similarities among all human beings, as captured within Multiculturalism (Sellers et al., 1998).
Given considerable alignment between our qualitative results and existing models of racial identity, the current study straddles the line between racial identity and narrative identity research. In both fields, scholars are ultimately interested in how dimensions of their respective constructs relate to psychological outcomes. Within the field of racial identity, most studies examining psychological outcomes rely on self‐report measures of racial identity (e.g., Chew, 2015; Elmore et al., 2012 ; Johnson & Carter, 2020; Lewis et al., 2018; Willis et al., 2021). By capturing racial identity through a set of narrative themes, the current study expands the literature on how racial identity relates to psychological outcomes. Likewise, by identifying race‐related narrative themes, we also highlight how race is important to the study of narrative identity among Black Americans, and our qualitative results are bolstered by a quantitative exploration of relations between race‐related narrative themes and psychological outcomes of well‐being, generativity, and wisdom.
Black Americans tend to show higher levels of concern for and commitment to the next generation than their white counterparts (e.g., Hart et al., 2001; Newton & Baltys, 2014) and report greater numbers of generative acts (McAdams, 2013) as well as a greater emphasis on community when considering the type of legacy they wish to leave behind (Newton & Jones, 2016). Furthermore, Black Americans score higher on related measures of social involvement, including political engagement, civic engagement, public service motivation, and religious engagement (Jones & McAdams, 2013). With respect to generativity and narrative identity, McAdams (2013) characterized the generative life in terms of five narrative themes—early advantage, sensitivity to suffering, moral steadfastness, redemption sequences, and prosocial goals—and McAdams and Guo (2015) found that Black participants told life stories with increased themes of moral steadfastness and prosocial goals.
While these studies offer compounding evidence for racial differences in generativity, it is important to consider why these differences exist: Fabius (2016) highlights the unique historical context and experiences of racial oppression that have shaped African American elders as well as the importance of multigenerational relationships as a source of resilience, strength, and hope among African American families throughout history (Waites, 2009). Likewise, storytelling has served as an important way for African American elders to pass on important wisdom, values, and methods of resilience to younger generations (Fabius, 2016). Generativity and wisdom are, in other words, a means by which older generations of Black Americans have helped younger generations navigate and survive within systems of racial oppression. There is thus an adaptive quality to generativity and wisdom for Black Americans that does not exist in the same way for members of other racial groups.
The nonsignificant relationship between racial narrative variables and well‐being is also worth exploring, given general interest among psychologists in this outcome measure and evidence of a relationship between self‐report measures of racial and ethnic identity and positive mental health outcomes (e.g., Chew, 2015; Neblett et al., 2012; Rivas‐Drake et al., 2014; Smith & Silva, 2011; Yip et al., 2019). One possibility is that our particular measure of racial identity—the extent to which individuals talk about race, without prompting, while telling their life stories—simply has no bearing on a person's well‐being. Another possibility is that the nature of racial discourse within the Life Story Interview renders relations with well‐being complex. For example, Syed et al. (2013) found that ethnic identity exploration is comprised of two dimensions, participation and search, which show opposing relations to well‐being. As our racial narratives also reflect a process of identity exploration, further analysis might uncover dimensions beyond those we have identified in the current study that differentially relate to well‐being.
Finally, it is likely that our findings are particular to the developmental and social context of our participants. For example, Smith and Silva (2011) found that associations between ethnic identity and well‐being were stronger for younger adults than adults over the age of 40. Given that midlife marks a shift toward caring for future generations, the age group of our sample may have contributed to relations between racial narrative variables and generativity. Relatedly, marginalizing societal structures makes traditional pathways to a “good life” less accessible to some groups than others (Bauer, 2021; Syed & McLean, 2022). Marginalization may also lead to alternate conceptions of a good life (Syed & McLean, 2022). It is possible that generativity and wisdom are more closely aligned with what good life has come to mean for the middle‐aged Black Americans in our sample than traditional measures of well‐being.

Sections

"[{\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0034\", \"jopy12932-bib-0043\", \"jopy12932-bib-0075\", \"jopy12932-bib-0039\", \"jopy12932-bib-0023\", \"jopy12932-bib-0047\"], \"section\": \"INTRODUCTION\", \"text\": \"Human beings make sense of their lives through stories. Personality and developmental psychologists use the term narrative identity to refer to an integrative and evolving story in the mind of a person that reconstructs the past and imagines the future (McAdams,\\u00a02001; McAdams & McLean,\\u00a02013; Singer,\\u00a02004). The story addresses questions like this: Who am I? Who am I becoming? What does my life mean? (McAdams,\\u00a02021). While this story develops internally, it is permeable to the outside world: cultural context shapes how people construct their stories, and stories in turn position individuals as active participants in society as they make sense of who they are, who they are becoming, and what their lives may mean (Hammack,\\u00a02008; McLean & Syed,\\u00a02015).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0065\", \"jopy12932-bib-0065\"], \"section\": \"Race and identity\", \"text\": \"U.S. history is steeped in notions of white supremacy and anti\\u2010Blackness, which continue to shape the present\\u2010day American cultural context (Rogers, Niwa, et\\u00a0al., 2021).\\u00a0 Racial groups were originally devised to establish a hierarchy of humanness that reinforced these ideologies, with those categorized as \\u201cwhite\\u201d at the top, those categorized as \\u201cBlack\\u201d at the bottom, and all other groups judged by proximity to these anchors (Rogers, Niwa, et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02021). While the implications of racial categorization have shifted through acts of resistance across history, racism persists, and continues to shape the daily experiences\\u2014and identities\\u2014of Americans. Amidst this historical context, psychologists have long been interested in how individuals navigate racism and develop a sense of racial identity.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0022\", \"jopy12932-bib-0069\", \"jopy12932-bib-0015\", \"jopy12932-bib-0015\", \"jopy12932-bib-0050\"], \"section\": \"Race and identity\", \"text\": \"Theories of racial identity development consider both process\\u2014how individuals' attitudes toward their racial group change over time\\u2014and content\\u2014what their attitudes are (Galliher et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02017; Scottham et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02010). Cross's\\u00a0(1971) Nigrescence theory offered an influential framework for understanding the process by which Black Americans navigate their racial identities. Initially unaware of race (Preencounter), Cross\\u00a0(1971) suggested, Black individuals are faced with an experience (Encounter) that prompts them to grapple with their new racial consciousness (Immersion\\u2010Emersion), which allows their racial identity to take hold and deepen (Internalization), ultimately contributing to a sense of collective identity and motivating activism (Internalization Commitment) (Neville & Cross,\\u00a02017). The theory cautioned that not all individuals go through every stage of this process, and individuals may also cycle through different stages at different times in their lives.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0073\", \"jopy12932-bib-0073\", \"jopy12932-bib-0009\", \"jopy12932-bib-0011\", \"jopy12932-bib-0090\", \"jopy12932-bib-0054\", \"jopy12932-bib-0016\", \"jopy12932-bib-0008\", \"jopy12932-bib-0010\", \"jopy12932-bib-0072\", \"jopy12932-bib-0070\", \"jopy12932-bib-0071\"], \"section\": \"Race and identity\", \"text\": \"On the content side, Sellers et\\u00a0al.'s\\u00a0(1998) Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity (MMRI) sets forth four dimensions of racial identity\\u2014racial salience, racial centrality, racial regard, and racial ideology\\u2014on which individuals naturally differ. The dominant approach to research on racial identity has been to translate these dimensions into quantitative measures and to examine relationships between these measures of racial identity and psychological outcomes. For example, the racial centrality dimension of the MMRI, which measures how important race is to a person's self\\u2010concept (Sellers et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a01998), has shown correlations with achievement motivation among African American girls (Butler\\u2010Barnes et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02018), civic engagement and activism among Black young adults (Chapman\\u2010Hilliard et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02022; Christophe et\\u00a0al., 2022; Pender et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02019), and healthcare mistrust among African American adults (Cuevas & O'Brien,\\u00a02019). Furthermore, while people higher in racial centrality tend to report more experiences of discrimination (Burrow & Ong,\\u00a02010; Chae et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02017; Sellers & Shelton,\\u00a02003), racial centrality also serves as a protective factor against the negative impact of these experiences (Seaton & Zeiders,\\u00a02021; Sellers et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02003).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0066\", \"jopy12932-bib-0004\", \"jopy12932-bib-0074\"], \"section\": \"Race and identity\", \"text\": \"Whereas these studies shed light on the psychological significance of racial identity, a growing body of qualitative studies have probed into people's lived experiences as members of their racial group. These studies are broad\\u2010ranging and include topics such as how children's racial identity narratives changed with the surge of the Black Lives Matter movement (Rogers, Rosario, et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02021), how African international students make sense of their Black racial identity in the United States (Asante et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02016), and how African American elders reminisce about their life experiences as African Americans (Shellman,\\u00a02004). A common approach across most qualitative studies of racial identity is to directly prompt individuals to talk about their racial experiences. The current study takes a different approach, exploring race from the vantage point of a person's broader narrative identity. While a focus on narrative identity does not preclude direct prompting about a person's racial experience\\u2014and indeed, racial identity could be conceived as part of a person's narrative identity\\u2014studies of narrative identity have not historically included prompts about race. Drawing on data from one of the most extensive studies of narrative identity to date, we consider how even without prompting, a sample of Black Americans talk about race while telling their life stories.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0019\", \"jopy12932-bib-0019\"], \"section\": \"Narrative identity\", \"text\": \"Considering race from the vantage point of narrative identity, we draw on Erik Erikson's\\u00a0(1963) conception of identity as an arrangement of the self, typically achieved in young adulthood but evolving thereafter, that situates the person in the adult world while providing a person's life with a sense of \\u201cinner sameness and continuity\\u201d (p. 261). Erikson\\u00a0(1963) characterized the awareness of identity as a process of reckoning with discontinuity, both within oneself and with respect to one's positioning in the broader social world.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0032\", \"jopy12932-bib-0043\", \"jopy12932-bib-0046\", \"jopy12932-bib-0039\", \"jopy12932-bib-0033\"], \"section\": \"Narrative identity\", \"text\": \"Building on Erikson's conception, McAdams\\u00a0(1985) suggested that the problem of identity first arises when adolescents and young adults sense discontinuity and inconsistency in their lives, across roles and over time, and seek to resolve the problem through narrative. The discontinuity may arise in many different forms. For example, a young person may believe that \\u201cwhen I am with my friends, I am outgoing and speak my mind, but when I am in class, I am quiet and don't say a word\\u201d; or, \\u201cwhen I was younger, I thought all white people were bad but now I host people from all over the world regularly at my home.\\u201d In order to make sense of such varied and conflicting experiences, individuals construct stories to explain how they have changed over time and what the different roles in their lives may mean. These stories comprise a person's narrative identity (McAdams & McLean,\\u00a02013; McLean et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02007), which develops as an internal, continually evolving narrative that integrates a person's experiences together into a coherent sense of self. In this way, narrative identity serves as a psychological resource, providing individuals with a sense of unity and purpose in their lives (McAdams,\\u00a02021). McAdams\\u00a0(1995) further conceived of narrative identity as one of three layers of personality, with the first layer consisting of a person's dispositional traits, the second layer consisting of a person's characteristic motivational agenda, and the third layer consisting of a person's identity and evolving life story. By exploring the racial content of life stories, we thus highlight the relevance of race to the study of personality among Black Americans, at the level of narrative identity.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0091\", \"jopy12932-bib-0063\", \"jopy12932-bib-0039\"], \"section\": \"Narrative identity and culture\", \"text\": \"Whereas identity is in one sense deeply personal, it is also profoundly cultural. Erikson\\u00a0(1968) described identity as a process that takes place, \\u201cin the core of an individual and yet also in the core of his communal culture, a process which establishes, in fact, the identity of those two identities\\u201d (p. 22, as cited in Rogers,\\u00a02018). Likewise, McAdams\\u00a0(2021) describes narrative identity as a psychosocial construction, co\\u2010authored by individuals and their surrounding cultures.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0007\", \"jopy12932-bib-0057\", \"jopy12932-bib-0059\", \"jopy12932-bib-0081\", \"jopy12932-bib-0084\", \"jopy12932-bib-0024\", \"jopy12932-bib-0045\", \"jopy12932-bib-0092\", \"jopy12932-bib-0006\", \"jopy12932-bib-0056\", \"jopy12932-bib-0086\"], \"section\": \"Narrative identity and culture\", \"text\": \"Methodological approaches for examining how narrative identity interacts with culture typically rely on the analysis of life stories. Methods include comparing narrative themes across cultural groups (e.g., Boytos et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02020; Reese et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02014, 2017; Turner,\\u00a02022; Wang & Singer,\\u00a02021), examining how personal narratives align with and deviate from broader cultural scripts or master narratives (e.g., Hammack,\\u00a02010; McLean et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02018; Westberg, 2022\\u00a0), exploring life narratives of a nondominant cultural group (e.g., Bigabo & Jansen,\\u00a02020; Ramirez & Hammack,\\u00a02014), and eliciting narratives about cultural events or experiences (e.g., Weststrate & McLean,\\u00a02010).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0002\", \"jopy12932-bib-0086\", \"jopy12932-bib-0057\"], \"section\": \"Narrative identity and culture\", \"text\": \"Although these studies differ in their specific approaches, one common methodological feature is that they involve collecting narrative accounts of specific experiences, events or memories, and evaluating a standard set of narratives for each participant (Adler et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02017). For example, Weststrate and McLean\\u00a0(2010) asked 251 participants to describe (1) a cultural event and (2) a self\\u2010defining memory that shaped their gay or lesbian identity, and their subsequent analysis considered features of participants' responses to these two prompts. Likewise, Reese et\\u00a0al.\\u00a0(2014) conducted interviews with 268 adolescents, coding three interview scenes\\u2014(1) high point, (2) low point, and (3) turning point narratives\\u2014for narrative themes and comparing themes across cultural groups.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0003\", \"jopy12932-bib-0001\", \"jopy12932-bib-0030\", \"jopy12932-bib-0044\", \"jopy12932-bib-0058\", \"jopy12932-bib-0012\", \"jopy12932-bib-0049\", \"jopy12932-bib-0062\", \"jopy12932-bib-0076\", \"jopy12932-bib-0089\", \"jopy12932-bib-0012\"], \"section\": \"Psychological correlates of narrative identity\", \"text\": \"Well\\u2010being, which refers to a person's overall sense of meaning and purpose in life, is considered an important outcome measure across psychological disciplines. The narrative identity literature reveals a clear link between narrative features and psychological well\\u2010being. Adler et\\u00a0al.\\u00a0(2016) delineated this link across four dimensions of narrative identity\\u2014motivational themes such as agency and communion, affective themes such as positive and negative emotional tone, meaning\\u2010making themes such as growth and exploration, and structural elements such as narrative coherence\\u2014noting where narrative variables add incremental validity as predictors of well\\u2010being compared to other variables across a number of studies (e.g., Adler,\\u00a02012; King et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02000; McAdams et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02001; Reese et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02011). Likewise, a substantial body of research has explored links between dimensions of racial and ethnic identity and positive mental health outcomes (e.g., Chew,\\u00a02015; Neblett et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02012; Rivas\\u2010Drake et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02014; Smith & Silva,\\u00a02011; Yip et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02019). For example, in a meta\\u2010analysis of studies utilizing the Racial Identity Attitudes Scale (RIAS) and various measures of psychological well\\u2010being, Chew\\u00a0(2015) reported a positive correlation between the Internalization subscale of the RIAS, which measures the extent to which race is positively incorporated into a person's self\\u2010concept, and psychological well\\u2010being. Bridging this literature, the current study explores how the presence of racial themes within narrative identity may correlate with psychological well\\u2010being.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0012\", \"jopy12932-bib-0076\", \"jopy12932-bib-0019\", \"jopy12932-bib-0038\", \"jopy12932-bib-0038\", \"jopy12932-bib-0040\", \"jopy12932-bib-0038\"], \"section\": \"Psychological correlates of narrative identity\", \"text\": \"Importantly, much of the existing research on racial and ethnic identity and positive mental health outcomes focuses on younger samples (Chew,\\u00a02015; Smith & Silva,\\u00a02011). Given the age group of our sample, we explore two additional developmentally appropriate psychological outcomes: generativity and wisdom. Within Erikson's\\u00a0(1963) theory of psychosocial development, generativity represents the central challenge of middle adulthood, as the core question guiding a person's development shifts from, \\u201cWho am I?\\u201d to \\u201cWhat will I leave behind?\\u201d (McAdams,\\u00a02018). Generativity reflects a person's commitment to caring for future generations through activities such as parenting, teaching, mentoring, leadership, and service to the community (McAdams,\\u00a02018). McAdams and de St Aubin\\u00a0(1992) lay out how generativity ultimately finds expression through narrative identity: a combination of cultural influences and inner desire prompt a person to develop a sense of concern for future generations, which ideally leads to a deeper commitment to developing generative goals, which in turn promotes generative action. Examples of generative action include giving birth to children, coming up with creative ideas, preserving rituals and traditions, participating in social movements, and letting go of one's generative efforts in the hope that what was created and nurtured will continue to flourish (McAdams,\\u00a02018). Throughout this process, individuals make narrative sense of their experiences, telling stories about their generative concerns and actions that are ultimately incorporated into their broader life stories.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0019\", \"jopy12932-bib-0020\", \"jopy12932-bib-0017\", \"jopy12932-bib-0017\", \"jopy12932-bib-0017\", \"jopy12932-bib-0042\", \"jopy12932-bib-0080\", \"jopy12932-bib-0025\", \"jopy12932-bib-0051\", \"jopy12932-bib-0037\"], \"section\": \"Psychological correlates of narrative identity\", \"text\": \"Likewise, later adulthood is characterized by the challenge of accepting one's life experiences as, \\u201csomething that had to be\\u201d (Erikson,\\u00a01963, p. 268), a process that nurtures a growing sense of wisdom (Erikson,\\u00a01982). While there is debate among psychologists about what, exactly, constitutes wisdom, a recent meta\\u2010analysis identified two general approaches to conceptualizing wisdom: performative wisdom, which captures how individuals respond in specific scenarios, and phenomenological wisdom, which captures people's recollections of their daily internal experiences (Dong et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02023). Dong et\\u00a0al.\\u00a0(2023) suggest that differences among measures have resulted in ambiguities in the nomological net of wisdom. For example, although meta\\u2010analytic results suggest a statistically significant correlation between wisdom and age, this correlation is moderated by wisdom type and wisdom measure, with most wisdom measures showing no significant relationship with age (Dong et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02023). That said, psychologists generally agree that wisdom reflects a sense of psychological maturity, gained through life experience, that allows certain older people to guide and counsel younger generations (McAdams et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02022; Taylor et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02011). Previous research has suggested that the ability to guide and counsel younger generations may be especially important among Black Americans: Black Americans tend to score higher on measures of generativity than white Americans (e.g., Hart et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02001; Newton & Baltys,\\u00a02014) and are also more likely to see themselves as sources of wisdom for their children (McAdams,\\u00a02013). The current study builds upon these findings to consider how the tendency to incorporate race into one's life story may relate to generativity and wisdom.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-note-0006\", \"jopy12932-bib-0048\"], \"section\": \"Research aims\", \"text\": \"The central aim of the current study is to explore how race manifests in the life stories of Black Americans. To do this, we employ a sequential mixed methods design\\n with three phases: first, we identify race\\u2010relevant scenes and explore the prevalence of these scenes within a larger set of life story interviews. Second, we inductively derive a set of \\u201cracial narrative themes\\u201d from these scenes. Third, we code each scene for the presence or absence of these themes to examine correlations between racial narrative themes and three psychological outcomes: psychological well\\u2010being, wisdom, and generativity. It is worth highlighting that most existing research on identity is conducted with white, young adult, and emerging adult college students (Mitchell et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02021), and our focus on middle\\u2010aged Black Americans expands this literature. Moreover, our multi\\u2010method approach considers not only the racial content of narrative identity but also how this content corresponds with psychological outcomes. Our inductive qualitative analysis is thus strengthened by an exploratory, data\\u2010driven approach, and the qualitative and quantitative nature of this study allows for a broad exploration of how race permeates the narrative identities and psychological health of middle\\u2010aged Black Americans.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0041\", \"jopy12932-note-0007\"], \"section\": \"Participants and procedure\", \"text\": \"Participants for this study were drawn from the larger Foley Longitudinal Study of Adulthood (FLSA; e.g., McAdams & Guo,\\u00a02015), conducted at Northwestern University between 2008 and 2018. The original study was approved by the Northwestern University Office for Research Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the protocol ID STU00001801. Participants were recruited via public venues such as the internet, bulletin boards, and newspaper ads, in the city of Chicago and surrounding suburbs. The original sample included 163 Black (N\\u2009=\\u200973) and white (N\\u2009=\\u200990) late\\u2010midlife adults. From this sample, 3 Black participants did not complete a Life Story Interview during Year 1 of FLSA and were thus excluded from the current study. In this study, 70 participants were included on the basis that they (1) completed a Year 1 Life Story Interview and (2) selected their race/ethnicity as \\u201cAfrican American,\\u201d (N\\u2009=\\u200967), \\u201cInterracial\\u201d (N\\u2009=\\u20091), or \\u201cOther\\u201d (N\\u2009=\\u20092).\\n Participants ranged in age from 52 to 56\\u2009years (M\\u2009=\\u200954.44, SD\\u2009=\\u20091.11) and were 73% female and 27% male. Annual family income levels of participants at the onset of the study ranged from under $25,000 to over $300,000, with a median income range of $50,000\\u2013$75,000. Education levels ranged from \\u201chigh school\\u201d to \\u201cgraduate work,\\u201d with a median education level of \\u201ccollege.\\u201d\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0035\", \"jopy12932-bib-0060\"], \"section\": \"Participants and procedure\", \"text\": \"Participants completed the Year 1 Life Story Interview (LSI; McAdams,\\u00a02008) in a dedicated interview room at Northwestern University. Of the nine trained interviewers\\u2014graduate students, postdocs, and faculty members\\u2014eight were white and one was Black and biracial (Reischer et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02021). In addition to the interview, participants also completed a battery of self\\u2010report measures. Participants were compensated $75 for each survey battery and $75 for each interview completed. Interviews were audio\\u2010recorded and professionally transcribed. Participants completed this process during Year 1, Year 5, and Year 9 of the study, with abridged versions of this protocol conducted in the years between. For the current study, we focus on data from Year 1 of FLSA.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0035\", \"jopy12932-bib-0035\"], \"section\": \"The Life Story Interview\", \"text\": \"The LSI (McAdams,\\u00a02008) is a comprehensive set of 22 prompts or \\u201cscenes\\u201d designed to capture narrative identity. The Year 1 interview included seven sections, each containing 1\\u20138 scenes: (1) Life Chapters (1 scene), in which participants were asked think of their lives as a book or novel and summarize each chapter; (2) Key Scenes (8 scenes), in which participants were asked to describe a high point, low point, turning point, positive childhood memory, negative childhood memory, vivid adult memory, religious, spiritual or mystical experience, and wisdom event in their lives; (3) Future Script (3 scenes), in which participants were asked to describe the next chapter in their lives, their dreams, hopes and plans, and a life project they are currently working on; (4) Challenges (4 scenes), in which participants were asked to describe their greatest life challenge, a health challenge, a loss, and a failure or regret; (5) Personal Ideology (4 scenes), in which participants were asked about their religious, ethical, political, social and other values; (6) Life Theme (1 scene), in which participants were asked to look back over their life and discern a central theme, message or idea; and (7) Reflection (1 scene), in which participants were asked to share any reflections on the experience of the interview (McAdams,\\u00a02008). Importantly, the interview did not include questions about race. The full interview protocol is available here: https://osf.io/tr7zv/.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0053\", \"jopy12932-bib-0067\"], \"section\": \"Context for current analysis\", \"text\": \"Although noted above, we wish to highlight several elements of the original study design which set parameters for the current investigation of racial narratives within FLSA. First, all but one interviewer was white. While narrative identity represents an internal story, sharing this story in the context of an interview is ultimately an interpersonal process. Listeners influence the stories people choose to relate to as well as the way people tell these stories (Pasupathi & Billitteri,\\u00a02015). For example, Rogers, Versey and Cielto\\u00a0(2021) offer a powerful example of how interviewers' shared positionality with their participants as Black women interviewing Black girls allowed participants to assume a \\u201crelational \\u2018we\\u2010ness\\u2019\\u201d (p. 7) with their interviewers, shaping the way they shared their stories. In the case of the current investigation, it is important to recognize that subsequent findings largely reflect how participants talk about race while telling their life stories to a white person.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0064\"], \"section\": \"Context for current analysis\", \"text\": \"Second, none of the LSI questions directly asks participants to talk about race. While the Life Story Interview was designed to elicit a person's broader narrative identity, this does not preclude incorporating questions related to race. Racial identity scholars have highlighted how the content and wording of questions influence the extent to which participants engage with cultural constructs throughout an interview (Rogers et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02022). Thus, it is important to recognize that subsequent findings reflect how participants talk about race without prompting and that a different set of prompts might elicit a different conceptualization of the role of race within narrative identity.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0050\", \"jopy12932-bib-0037\"], \"section\": \"Researcher positionality\", \"text\": \"In addition to the historical context shaping participants' lives, the current analysis, conducted between 2021 and 2023, was motivated and shaped by the historical context of researchers' lives: our analysis comes at a time of increased attention to racial justice following highly publicized violence against Black lives, the resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement, and the widespread reckoning with the persistence of racism across time (Neville & Cross,\\u00a02017). Researchers' individual experiences also shaped their interpretations of participants' stories. Experiences shaping the first author's perspective included being a Southeast Asian (Indian) American woman in her late twenties, having parents who are immigrants, and working at a nonprofit where she organized community dialogues centered around race. Experiences shaping the second author's perspective included being a first\\u2010generation, young Black woman in her early twenties, raised by Dominican family members in the Bronx. As a Psychology and Black Studies student, the second author drew upon both disciplines, along with her own national and diasporic identity to listen for the breadth of Blackness within participants' stories. The third author's perspective was shaped by her experience being a Southeast Asian (Thai) woman in her early 20s and by her earliest exposure to American culture\\u2014living temporarily in a predominantly Black and Mexican community in the United States as a child\\u2014as well as by conversations about race after returning to America as an adult. Experiences shaping the fourth author's perspective include being a white man in his late 60s who grew up in a segregated midwestern city, where race relations were fraught, as well as engaging in previous research and writing about narrative identity among Black Americans in midlife (e.g., McAdams,\\u00a02013).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0002\", \"jopy12932-bib-0013\", \"jopy12932-bib-0014\"], \"section\": \"Deriving racial narratives\", \"text\": \"From the full Life Story Interviews, we sought to identify the unique subset of scenes, for each participant, containing race\\u2010related themes. Our focus on scenes aligns with existing guidelines for analyzing narrative data (e.g., Adler et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02017); however, our procedure for data preparation departs from previous studies of narrative identity in that we selected scenes for analysis based on the presence of specific thematic content. In particular, we conducted a keyword search for race\\u2010related terms, with keywords derived from the data, and included only those scenes containing race\\u2010related terms. \\u201cRace\\u2010related terms\\u201d were defined as any words that the first three authors identified as connected to race in some way, whether explicitly or implicitly. Implicit references were included with the understanding that race permeates many aspects of a person's experience, and racism intersects with other systems of oppression such as classism and sexism (Cole,\\u00a02009; Crenshaw,\\u00a01991). The first author began by reading 10 full interviews, randomly selected from the data set, and keeping a list of any race\\u2010relevant terms she could identify within these interviews. The second and third authors repeated this process with five additional interviews each.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-tbl-0001\"], \"section\": \"Deriving racial narratives\", \"text\": \"Authors' keyword lists were merged, alphabetized, and edited to remove duplicates. Using the NVivo Text Search tool, each word was then assessed by examining the contexts in which it appeared in the dataset. Primary reasons for exclusion were that the word was too broad, turning up many instances that did not clearly relate to race (e.g., \\u201cattractive,\\u201d \\u201cbackground,\\u201d \\u201cbible\\u201d), or that the word occurred infrequently, without a clear connection to race. Examples of keywords in the final list are presented in Table\\u00a01 (organized by general category). The full list of keywords can be found here: https://osf.io/tr7zv/.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-note-0008\"], \"section\": \"Deriving racial narratives\", \"text\": \"Our full list of keywords was entered into the NVivo Text Search tool, which highlighted all instances of these words (including stems) within each interview. In every transcript, LSI scenes were demarcated by interview prompts, marking a shift from one scene to the next. Each interview was trimmed to include only the scenes, unique to each participant, containing one or more racial keywords.\\n In this process, one scene, Life Chapters, was split into smaller sections due to the lengthy responses it elicited, and each section was considered a separate scene. These trimmed \\u201cracial narratives\\u201d were used for subsequent analysis.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0096\"], \"section\": \"Qualitative analysis\", \"text\": \"Racial narratives were organized in order of keyword frequency. Following the steps for thematic analysis outlined by McAdams\\u00a0(2012), the authors started with the interview containing the highest frequency of race\\u2010related keywords, highlighting noteworthy excerpts, and annotating the interview with inferences. The authors met to discuss their impressions, reflecting on how their own experiences shaped what stood out to them in the interview. The authors repeated this process for each subsequent interview, meeting regularly to discuss their impressions, and continuing this process until they started to see recurring themes. These recurring themes were organized into an initial list of categories. To explore how these categories emerged across the broader sample, the authors then assessed a subset of interviews for the presence or absence of each category, refining the categories in this process to develop a final list of themes.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0093\"], \"section\": \"Translating themes into quantitative data\", \"text\": \"Following Syed and Nelson's (2015) guidance on quantifying qualitative data, a working coding manual was developed to include a description of each theme, inclusion and exclusion rules, examples of excerpts that would be coded as each theme, and negative cases. The full set of 460 racial narratives was then coded for the presence or absence of these themes (presence\\u2009=\\u20091; absence\\u2009=\\u20090). The unit of analysis was defined as each scene, meaning that raters assigned separate codes to each scene within each participant's racial narrative. The themes were divided into two subsets, and a team of two raters coded the narratives for each subset of themes. Raters coded the narratives in eight batches, and interrater reliability was assessed for each batch. Raters met regularly to discuss disagreements, including further discussion of how their own experiences shaped their interpretation of the data. The coding manual was updated after each meeting to reflect a developing mutual perspective on the scope of each theme. The final coding manual is available here: https://osf.io/tr7zv/.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-fig-0001\"], \"section\": \"Translating themes into quantitative data\", \"text\": \"Each raters' codes were combined into a master spreadsheet. Average codes were calculated across each team, for each data point, and used for subsequent analysis. Overall, frequencies of each theme were calculated by summing codes for each theme. Scene\\u2010level data were aggregated to create composite scores for each theme at the participant level. Since participants differed in the number of total scenes within their racial narratives, a new variable, Number of Racially Themed Scenes, was created to capture this information about the overall salience of race within each participant's life story (Figure\\u00a01).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0068\"], \"section\": \"Self\\u2010report measures\", \"text\": \"Within their battery of self\\u2010report measures, participants completed measures of psychological well\\u2010being, wisdom, and generativity. Psychological well\\u2010being was measured using Ryff's Scales of Psychological Well\\u2010Being (PWB; Ryff & Keyes,\\u00a01995), which considers well\\u2010being across six dimensions: autonomy (\\u201cmy decisions are not usually influenced by what everyone else is doing\\u201d), environmental mastery (\\u201cI am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily life\\u201d), personal growth (\\u201cI think it is important to have new experiences that challenge how you think about yourself and the world\\u201d), positive relationships (\\u201cpeople would describe me as a giving person, willing to share my time with others\\u201d), purpose in life (\\u201csome people wander aimlessly through life, but I am not one of them\\u201d), and self\\u2010acceptance (\\u201cI am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily life\\u201d). Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with items on a 1\\u20136 scale, ranging from \\u201cstrongly disagree\\u201d to \\u201cstrongly agree.\\u201d Cronbach's alpha for the current sample was 0.92 across all items.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0085\"], \"section\": \"Self\\u2010report measures\", \"text\": \"Wisdom was measured through the Self\\u2010Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS; Webster,\\u00a02003), which considers wisdom as a combination of five dimensions: experience (\\u201cI have seen much of the negative side of life\\u201d), emotion regulation (\\u201cI can regulate my emotions when the situation calls for it\\u201d), reminiscence and reflectiveness (\\u201cI often recall earlier times in my life to see how I've changed since then\\u201d), openness (\\u201cI'm very curious about other religions and/or philosophical belief systems\\u201d), and humor (\\u201cI can make fun of myself to comfort others\\u201d). Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with items on a 1\\u20136 scale, ranging from \\u201cstrongly disagree\\u201d to \\u201cstrongly agree.\\u201d Cronbach's alpha for the current sample was 0.82 across all items.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0040\", \"jopy12932-tbl-0003\"], \"section\": \"Self\\u2010report measures\", \"text\": \"Generativity, broadly defined as concern for future generations, was measured through the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS; McAdams & de St Aubin,\\u00a01992), which includes items such as, \\u201cI try to pass along the knowledge I have gained through my experiences,\\u201d \\u201cI have a responsibility to improve the neighborhood in which I live,\\u201d and \\u201cI have created things that have made an impact on other people.\\u201d Participants rated how often the statement applied to them, on a 0\\u20133 scale ranging from \\u201cnever\\u201d to \\u201cvery often or nearly always.\\u201d Cronbach's alpha for the current sample was 0.80 across all items. Descriptive statistics for all self\\u2010report measures are reported in Table\\u00a03.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-fig-0001\"], \"section\": \"Prevalence of racial scenes\", \"text\": \"Through a broad keyword search for race\\u2010related terms, we identified 460 racially themed interview scenes. All participants referenced race at least once during their Life Story Interview, and the number of scenes in which participants referenced race ranged from 1 to 17 (Figure\\u00a01) with an average of 6.57 racially themed scenes. Participants in the lowest range of racially themed scenes tended to reference race indirectly and sparsely, through words such as \\u201cwig,\\u201d \\u201ccommunity,\\u201d and \\u201cBaptist.\\u201d Participants in the higher ranges tended to reference race directly and frequently within each scene, using terms such as \\u201cBlack,\\u201d \\u201cAfrican American,\\u201d and \\u201cracism.\\u201d\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-note-0009\"], \"section\": \"Prevalence of racial scenes\", \"text\": \"Overall,\\u00a0152 scenes (33%) fell within the Key Scenes section of the Life Story Interview. Asked to recall a vivid memory from her adult life, for example, Shirley referenced her Black identity while describing what it meant to her family when she walked across the stage to receive her law degree\\n:\\n\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-tbl-0002\"], \"section\": \"Racial narrative themes\", \"text\": \"Through an iterative process of reading racial narratives and keeping track of themes, we identified seven overarching racial narrative themes: Black Cultural Identity, Community of Care, Systemic Racism, Activism, Racial Reckoning, Multiculturalism, and Encounter with Racism. We present these themes, along with an exemplary quote, in Table\\u00a02.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-tbl-0003\"], \"section\": \"Translating qualitative themes into quantitative data\", \"text\": \"Upon identifying these racial narrative themes, we \\u201ccoded\\u201d each scene, in two teams, for the presence or absence of each theme. Importantly, these themes were interrelated and not mutually exclusive. Overall interrater reliability ranged from good to excellent: M\\n\\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.70 and M\\n% agreement\\u2009=\\u200987 for team one; M\\n\\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.76 and M\\n% agreement\\u2009=\\u200988 for team two. Interrater reliability for individual themes ranged from fair to excellent: for Black Cultural Identity, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.78 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200989; for Community of Care, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.54 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200977; for Systemic Racism, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.64 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200983; for Activism, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.65 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200987; for Racial Reckoning, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.56 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200986; for Multiculturalism, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.70 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200994; for Encounter with Racism, \\ud835\\udf05\\u2009=\\u20090.71 and % agreement\\u2009=\\u200996. Table\\u00a03 presents descriptive statistics, including the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range for each study variable.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-fig-0002\"], \"section\": \"Translating qualitative themes into quantitative data\", \"text\": \"Most narrative themes spanned a wide range of scores and were skewed toward the lower end of the distribution. Multiculturalism and Encounter with Racism spanned narrower ranges. These themes were less common overall: several participants did not include these themes in their racial narratives, and those who did included them relatively infrequently. These differences in the range of our narrative themes may be due to differences in nature of each theme: Black Cultural Identity, Community of Care, and Systemic Racism, in particular, were broader constructs that encompassed a wide variety of responses, while Multiculturalism and Encounter with Racism were narrower constructs and therefore captured fewer and a smaller range of responses. Complimenting these descriptive statistics, we also examined the prevalence of each theme across participants and across all scenes (Figure\\u00a02). Community of Care and Black Cultural Identity were the most frequently occurring themes, with Community of Care represented across 94% of participants and within 47% of total scenes coded and Black Cultural Identity represented across 88% of participants and within 49% of total scenes coded. In comparison, Multiculturalism was less common, represented across 57% of participants and within 11% of total scenes coded. Likewise, Encounter with Racism was the least frequently occurring theme, represented across 37% of participants and within 8% of total scenes coded.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-tbl-0004\"], \"section\": \"Translating qualitative themes into quantitative data\", \"text\": \"Finally, most of our narrative variables were significantly correlated with each other (Table\\u00a04). All themes were moderately to highly correlated with overall number of racially themed scenes (r\\u2009=\\u20090.42 to r\\u2009=\\u20090.76): in other words, talking about race in a wider selection of Life Story Interview scenes corresponded to higher levels of racial narrative themes. This makes sense, given that scenes were selected for their racial content and themes were derived directly from these scenes. Furthermore, most themes were moderately correlated with each other (r\\u2009=\\u20090.20 to r\\u2009=\\u20090.51), and some themes were highly correlated with each other (r\\u2009=\\u20090.66 to r\\u2009=\\u20090.85). For example, Black Cultural Identity, Encounter with Racism, Systemic Racism and Racial Reckoning were highly intercorrelated, which makes sense, given that participants often referenced their Black/African American identity when highlighting incidents of racism, referencing broader systems of oppression, and reckoning with race. Furthermore, stories about encounters with racism were likely to contain references to broader systems at play and reflections on the experience. And when participants reckoned with race, for the most part, this meant reflecting on some aspect of racism. Likewise, Activism was also highly correlated with Black Cultural Identity, Systemic Racism, and Racial Reckoning, which highlights a noteworthy relationship between participants' tendency to incorporate race and racism into their narrative identities and their motivation to contribute to the broader world.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-tbl-0004\"], \"section\": \"Associations with psychological measures\", \"text\": \"The final aim of this study was to examine correlations between racial narrative variables (including racial narrative themes and Number of Racially Themed Scenes) and three measures of psychological health: psychological well\\u2010being, wisdom, and generativity. Table\\u00a04 includes these correlational results, which suggest that the salience of race within the Life Story Interview is associated with wisdom and generativity. Specifically, generativity showed significant positive correlations with the Number of Racially Themed Scenes (r\\u2009=\\u20090.37), Black Cultural Identity (r\\u2009=\\u20090.33), Multiculturalism (r\\u2009=\\u20090.37), Activism (r\\u2009=\\u20090.37), Systemic Racism (r\\u2009=\\u20090.31), and Racial Reckoning (r\\u2009=\\u20090.28). Wisdom showed significant positive correlations with Number of Racially Themed Scenes (r\\u2009=\\u20090.26), Black Cultural Identity (r\\u2009=\\u20090.24), Multiculturalism (r\\u2009=\\u20090.30), and Activism (r\\u2009=\\u20090.28). Although wisdom and generativity were both significantly correlated with well\\u2010being, none of the racial narrative variables showed significant correlations with well\\u2010being.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0073\"], \"section\": \"DISCUSSION\", \"text\": \"The purpose of this study was to explore the role of race within the broader narrative identity of Black Americans in midlife. While telling their life stories, 100% of participants referenced race, and the number of interview scenes in which participants referenced race ranged from 1 to 17, highlighting both the overall salience of race for participants as they narrated their life stories and the natural variance in the extent to which participants brought up race while telling their stories. We use the term salience rather than centrality, in line with Sellers et\\u00a0al.'s\\u00a0(1998) MMRI, to highlight that this interview represents a particular situational context. Participants were asked to tell their life stories without any prompting to speak specifically about race, and in most cases, participants shared their life stories with a white interviewer. It is likely that a different situation\\u2014for example, being prompted to speak about race and/or speaking with Black interviewers only\\u2014would have resulted in different levels of racial discourse throughout the Life Story Interview. However, it is not entirely surprising that race\\u2010related content was mentioned by all participants in our sample, given the cultural context of racism in the United States and the cohort effect of growing up during the highly racially salient civil rights period.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0064\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"These qualitative results fall in line with existing frameworks for understanding racism and racial identity development. For example, Systemic Racism and Encounter with Racism parallel structural and interpersonal interpretations of racism. Furthermore, Systemic Racism occurred more frequently across our data set than Encounter with Racism, exemplifying a phenomenon that racial identity researchers have previously highlighted: individuals are often hesitant to explicitly name experiences of racism, and this hesitance itself reflects a cultural norm (Rogers et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02022). Yet racism often operates covertly through systems rather than overtly through interpersonal interactions, and our results suggest that individuals may be more comfortable referencing covert racism while telling their life stories.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0082\", \"jopy12932-bib-0027\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"Our life story data also reflect the notion of racial socialization: that as Black children grow up, community members can help reduce the negative impacts of racism by raising awareness about structural inequality, promoting critical consciousness, and nurturing a strong sense of identity (Umami\\u2010Taylor & Hill,\\u00a02020). For example, James's third\\u2010grade teacher instructed her students about the inequalities they would face as Black children and equipped them with tools to face this harsh reality. In a review of the literature on parents\\u2019 ethnic\\u2010racial socialization, Hughes et\\u00a0al.\\u00a0(2006) identified the following themes, which parallel themes in our set of racial narratives: (1) cultural socialization, which includes instilling racial pride as captured within Black Cultural Identity, (2) preparation for bias, which involves raising awareness about racial barriers and racism, as captured within Community of Care and Activism, (3) promotion of mistrust, which emphasizes the need for caution in interracial interactions, and (4) egalitarianism, which highlights equality among ethnic\\u2010racial groups, as captured within Multiculturalism.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0015\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"In some cases, our racial narratives and corresponding themes also mapped onto Cross's\\u00a0(1971) stages of Nigrescence. At the start of his story, for example, James describes experiences of racial violence during the Civil Rights Movement (Encounter/Encounter with Racism), which prompts him to grapple with his racial identity (Immersion\\u2010Emersion/Racial Reckoning). His racial consciousness is deepened when his family moves to Michigan and he attends an integrated school for the first time, where he observes differences in opportunities afforded to Black and white students (Internalization/Systemic Racism). Over time, James's racial consciousness motivates his goals to improve the educational system for all kids and to, \\u201craise every Black man and [boy's] level of consciousness so they could understand\\u2026what they are facing in this society\\u201d (Internalization Commitment/Black Cultural Identity/Activism).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0073\", \"jopy12932-bib-0073\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"Likewise, our racial narrative themes also reflect elements of the MMRI (Sellers et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a01998). For example, the MMRI includes the dimension of Racial Ideology, a person's philosophies about how members of their racial group should relate to society. These philosophies include nationalist and humanist perspectives. The nationalist perspective highlights the unique history, culture, and accomplishments of African Americans, as captured within Black Cultural Identity, while the humanist philosophy emphasizes similarities among all human beings, as captured within Multiculturalism (Sellers et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a01998).\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0012\", \"jopy12932-bib-0095\", \"jopy12932-bib-0028\", \"jopy12932-bib-0031\", \"jopy12932-bib-0094\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"Given considerable alignment between our qualitative results and existing models of racial identity, the current study straddles the line between racial identity and narrative identity research. In both fields, scholars are ultimately interested in how dimensions of their respective constructs relate to psychological outcomes. Within the field of racial identity, most studies examining psychological outcomes rely on self\\u2010report measures of racial identity (e.g., Chew,\\u00a02015; Elmore et\\u00a0al., 2012\\u00a0; Johnson & Carter,\\u00a02020; Lewis et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02018; Willis et\\u00a0al., 2021). By capturing racial identity through a set of narrative themes, the current study expands the literature on how racial identity relates to psychological outcomes. Likewise, by identifying race\\u2010related narrative themes, we also highlight how race is important to the study of narrative identity among Black Americans, and our qualitative results are bolstered by a quantitative exploration of relations between race\\u2010related narrative themes and psychological outcomes of well\\u2010being, generativity, and wisdom.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0025\", \"jopy12932-bib-0051\", \"jopy12932-bib-0037\", \"jopy12932-bib-0052\", \"jopy12932-bib-0029\", \"jopy12932-bib-0037\", \"jopy12932-bib-0041\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"Black Americans tend to show higher levels of concern for and commitment to the next generation than their white counterparts (e.g., Hart et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02001; Newton & Baltys,\\u00a02014) and report greater numbers of generative acts (McAdams,\\u00a02013) as well as a greater emphasis on community when considering the type of legacy they wish to leave behind (Newton & Jones,\\u00a02016). Furthermore, Black Americans score higher on related measures of social involvement, including political engagement, civic engagement, public service motivation, and religious engagement (Jones & McAdams,\\u00a02013). With respect to generativity and narrative identity, McAdams\\u00a0(2013) characterized the generative life in terms of five narrative themes\\u2014early advantage, sensitivity to suffering, moral steadfastness, redemption sequences, and prosocial goals\\u2014and McAdams and Guo\\u00a0(2015) found that Black participants told life stories with increased themes of moral steadfastness and prosocial goals.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0021\", \"jopy12932-bib-0083\", \"jopy12932-bib-0021\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"While these studies offer compounding evidence for racial differences in generativity, it is important to consider why these differences exist: Fabius\\u00a0(2016) highlights the unique historical context and experiences of racial oppression that have shaped African American elders as well as the importance of multigenerational relationships as a source of resilience, strength, and hope among African American families throughout history (Waites,\\u00a02009). Likewise, storytelling has served as an important way for African American elders to pass on important wisdom, values, and methods of resilience to younger generations (Fabius,\\u00a02016). Generativity and wisdom are, in other words, a means by which older generations of Black Americans have helped younger generations navigate and survive within systems of racial oppression. There is thus an adaptive quality to generativity and wisdom for Black Americans that does not exist in the same way for members of other racial groups.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0012\", \"jopy12932-bib-0049\", \"jopy12932-bib-0062\", \"jopy12932-bib-0076\", \"jopy12932-bib-0089\", \"jopy12932-bib-0078\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"The nonsignificant relationship between racial narrative variables and well\\u2010being is also worth exploring, given general interest among psychologists in this outcome measure and evidence of a relationship between self\\u2010report measures of racial and ethnic identity and positive mental health outcomes (e.g., Chew,\\u00a02015; Neblett et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02012; Rivas\\u2010Drake et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02014; Smith & Silva,\\u00a02011; Yip et\\u00a0al.,\\u00a02019). One possibility is that our particular measure of racial identity\\u2014the extent to which individuals talk about race, without prompting, while telling their life stories\\u2014simply has no bearing on a person's well\\u2010being. Another possibility is that the nature of racial discourse within the Life Story Interview renders relations with well\\u2010being complex. For example, Syed et\\u00a0al.\\u00a0(2013) found that ethnic identity exploration is comprised of two dimensions, participation and search, which show opposing relations to well\\u2010being. As our racial narratives also reflect a process of identity exploration, further analysis might uncover dimensions beyond those we have identified in the current study that differentially relate to well\\u2010being.\"}, {\"pmc\": \"PMC11891957\", \"pmid\": \"38606602\", \"reference_ids\": [\"jopy12932-bib-0076\", \"jopy12932-bib-0005\", \"jopy12932-bib-0077\", \"jopy12932-bib-0077\"], \"section\": \"James's story\", \"text\": \"Finally, it is likely that our findings are particular to the developmental and social context of our participants. For example, Smith and Silva\\u00a0(2011) found that associations between ethnic identity and well\\u2010being were stronger for younger adults than adults over the age of 40. Given that midlife marks a shift toward caring for future generations, the age group of our sample may have contributed to relations between racial narrative variables and generativity. Relatedly, marginalizing societal structures makes traditional pathways to a \\u201cgood life\\u201d less accessible to some groups than others (Bauer,\\u00a02021; Syed & McLean,\\u00a02022). Marginalization may also lead to alternate conceptions of a good life (Syed & McLean,\\u00a02022). It is possible that generativity and wisdom are more closely aligned with what good life has come to mean for the middle\\u2010aged Black Americans in our sample than traditional measures of well\\u2010being.\"}]"

Metadata

"{\"source-schema-version-number\": \"2.0\", \"cover-date\": \"April 2025\", \"details-of-publishers-convertor\": \"Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.4 mode:remove_FC converted:10.03.2025\"}"